@hitsusatsu11 said:
"
@Godot said:
"
@hitsusatsu11 said:
"
I lean towards real, but it could just as easily have been faked.
"
It really couldn't. For the all the effort it would have taken to fake it and make sure none of the HUNDREDS AND HUNDREDS of people involved in it blabbed, they would have been better off developing the technology anyway.
"
It would have taken much much less effort to fake it then to go through with it. In addition it would be smarter to fake a landing and ensure success then to take a huge gamble and risk embarrassment in the eyes of the Soviets.
I also somewhat question if engineering 30+ years ago was really advanced enough to get the job done, but people can do anything when they put there mind into it.
I'm on the fence on this one, I have only done slight research into it and as such have no tangible reason to disbelieve the official story."
Whoops, looks like I was wrong.
It was actually 400,000 people. And no-one ratted them out? No-one, with definitive proof of them faking the moon-landings, out of 400,000, has come forward. And yes, engineering
40+ years ago was advanced enough. After all, what can be considered as the first true computer came out in
1941.