@Vapovile: TOAA's present. Matches with him are banned.
EDIT: Wait, that was a joke thread? I need to tweak the rules slightly then with banned characters.
Considering matches involving the Living Tribunal are now banned here in the forum, time to lock this up.
@SMXLR8: You can still post details for match threads. As addressed, this plan I have is in mind for matches posted by people who don't do so and would reduce some of the rigidness required in creating matches for the forum.
In the meantime, I'll leave this up for the weekend and see what others think in case anything else needs to be tweaked. If most people support it, I'll get going with applying my default format for the forum rules.
Taking a current poll count: Dark Schneider's harem has the slight lead for the first match 3-2 and Tenchi's harem leads 4-2.
@waybig1010101: I'll leave things as is for now with planetary-level.
As for higher levels, rules are mostly the same yet with different settings and distances...
-Star to solar system level - Milky Way galaxy, 80 million km apart.
-Galaxy to Universe level - Our Universe, full length of Milky Way galaxy apart.
-Multiversal level+- Ummmm, any ideas?
@waybig1010101: My intent with this is to make things simple as possible with conditions for default rules. The settings I have in the revised rules should be fine for most matches involving anyone at or below planetary-level in scope. However, these conditions wouldn't be so ideal for anyone above that tier, which I'm still trying to fine-tune.
sorry i wasn't really too clear and thats my fault for not explaining myself well. I saying that for either strongest, current, or EOS I think we might as well use the versions between those three options in order to make the fight as close as possible not every single version. i do understand what you mean, but we still would have to debate over which version to use between the three you gave. So that one character could be current and another strongest in order to make the fight closer, you know what i mean?
With the new 100-200 post limit Sonata has for matches, it would make debate on what versions of characters, distance and location to consider for a default rules match a waste of posts for the thread's life span.
As for what I posted, I guess I need to clarify what I mean with my rules.
Anime/ manga/ light novels
Whatever is the most popular or mainstream version of the character commonly used for battle threads get factored in. In the case of comics (which are notorious for having many alternate universes), Earth-616 versions of Marvel Comic characters and Post-Crisis versions of DC Comics characters would be used, unless a different version gets specified in the thread topic.
Revised, with additions and tweaks...
I think we should go with versions of the characters that will make the fight as close as possible
The problem with that is people will have different assumptions of what they assume would be close in attributes for opposing characters/ factions/ teams and it would lead to the match derailing into a debate over how what level the characters should be set at for the match. Setting them at current, EoS, and/or strongest showings eliminates this issue.
I do not think that the room of spirit and time (Hyperbolic Time Chamber) would be the best location considering that the gravity is stronger (10X), that the air gets denser, and the temperature fluctuates, which only gets worse the deeper a person goes in the chamber. So its not really a good neutral zone if you know what I mean. Also the distance is too short IMO
Fair point. Forgot how it affected Future Trunks when he experienced it in the Cell saga. I'll have to think of another default battle area. As for distance, how about 100 yards?
I'm still considering some tweaks. But here's the gist of what I have in mind for default settings:
The tweaks in question I'm still trying to work out have to do with factoring in elements to specific character abilities since we occasionally have characters utilizing some form of high-level hax and abilities that don't have an equivalent function in another title.