Japan's Latest Giant Monster is a Baby

Topic started by gia on Jan. 18, 2010. Last post by Addfwyn 4 years, 6 months ago.
Post by gia (3,032 posts) See mini bio Level 13

 OH GOD KILL IT BEFORE IT KILLS HIM
 OH GOD KILL IT BEFORE IT KILLS HIM
Of all the many, many things I could imagine wanting to have a robot around for (cleaning, taxes...um, sex...), screaming, crying, and breaking my stuff are NOT on the list.

 IT IS GOING TO HUG HER TO DEATH!
 IT IS GOING TO HUG HER TO DEATH!
Which didn't stop researchers in Japan from making a mega-baby, a 66-pound 4'3" tall named "Diego-san" who is supposed to help researchers in Japan figure out how babies develop their motor skills and the like.

Hey, are any of you scientists? Honestly, I don't quite understand why a robot built by us would magically have similar learning processes to a baby. I mean, is the idea that in the process of figuring out how to program it, we might be able to analogize that programming to the way a baby works? Iiiiii dunno.

Eh, either way, this thing is just creepy.
Post by Rover (25 posts) See mini bio Level 1
There are programs out there that are used by biologist to see how long dead animal species might have walked/flown/trotted, that based on bone structure and possible muscle structure run a billion tests on what the most effective ways the animal could have moved and what are the most possible ways an animal could have moved. So I don't really understand why they couldn't just use software like that when we already know the muscle structure of a baby.... I think these scientist just have to much time of their hands and just wanted a reason to make yet another creepy robot.....
Post by rein (5,465 posts) See mini bio Level 15
i want one so i can shake it
Post by RedLeaderXIII (1 posts) See mini bio Level 1
creepy
Post by sora_thekey (1,097 posts) See mini bio Level 16
Moderator

0.0 I think I'm going to throw up!
Post by gia (3,032 posts) See mini bio Level 13
@Rover: But then they wouldn't impress people as much and wouldn't get as much money from investors to spend on themselves...
Post by agila61 (87 posts) See mini bio Level 4
@gia: ... including the robots they do not show to the media that do ... uh, other stuff.
Post by Slim (238 posts) See mini bio Level 3
This will give me nightmares. Just look at its head! It's HUGE!
Post by JJOR64 (2,074 posts) See mini bio Level 16

 Mind blown.
 Mind blown.
Post by gia (3,032 posts) See mini bio Level 13
@agila61: They show them to the media, just not while they're doing that "other stuff" =P
Post by Killroycantkill (70 posts) See mini bio Level 12
All that reminds me of is the baby from Spirited Away
Post by Konanda (796 posts) See mini bio Level 17

@gia said:

" Of all the many, many things I could imagine wanting to have a robot around for (cleaning, taxes...um, sex...) "



Someone's not getting enough.

Post by FoxxFireArt (2,639 posts) See mini bio Level 25
Moderator
Just freakin' creepy.
Post by Addfwyn (408 posts) See mini bio Level 16
Thank you Gia. I am now going to have horrible nightmares for the next month, waking up in a cold sweat in the middle of the night with haunting images of giant robot babies with eye lasers assaulting my room, intending to harvest my organs in order to build more of their creepy baby robots.  The entire time crying for their mommy while probing with blades and soft lifelike baby hands. 
 
The horror.
Post by wwfunderaker (485 posts) See mini bio Level 15
Really creepy, i first thought that image was fake. Sleepless nights ahead.
Post by Nerx (13,843 posts) See mini bio Level 12
This looks like some creepy fetish given life
Post by cfatalis (19,150 posts) See mini bio Level 15
@Nerx said:
" This looks like some creepy fetish given life "
try nightmare, no one had fetish on that
 
@gia:
from now on, i will sleep with my guns under the pillow, or for that matter sleep in the day
Post by Nerx (13,843 posts) See mini bio Level 12
@cfatalis: What about rule 34?
Post by cfatalis (19,150 posts) See mini bio Level 15
@Nerx: rule 34 states that if it exist there's a porn of it
 
it doesn't say anything about anything LIKING IT
Post by Valdor (27 posts) See mini bio Level 2
@cfatalis: But here's the thing; if there IS porn of it, then that means SOMEONE found it attractive who decided to make it.  Rule 34 in essence means that as soon as you think of it or create it, someone somewhere has a fetish for it.
Top Editors
Top Posters
HeeroYuy
48 posts
gia
36 posts
Sonata
26 posts
John_Martone
26 posts
cfatalis
26 posts
lanaswift
23 posts
Sigue
19 posts
Nerx
19 posts
Void_Wizard
17 posts
Kuro
15 posts
Mandatory Network

Submissions can take several hours to be approved.

Save ChangesCancel