your logic so bad i could cry for you. its so embarrasing!
really? if somone does something ONCE in their life, it doesnt count or isnt concidered legit? since when did THAT make sense?
the slaves were set free (but only ONCE) in 1865. no way! they werent set free a LOT of times, not it doest count! they still need to be slaves, it happed only once!
you were once 3 years old. but that only happened ONCE! so, accoring to your logic, you were only 3 once and that means you were NEVER 3 years old!
you were homeless once. but that doesnt mean ANYTHING! after all, you were homeless ONCE, and that means it NEVER happened!
your mother had a popsicle when she was 5, but only once. but she had it only ONCE, so she never had it in the first place!
see how rediculous that sounds?
if sonic did something only ONCE, then that takes away his BIRTHPLACE. he had only ONE game once upon a time. if we used your logic, when sonic just came out, SEGA would have to say, "well, sonic only had ONE game, so yeah, hes not a video game character. because he only came out ONCE!" and there would be no more sonic games.
That rule is used to discern what is a CONSISTENT feat for a character, something which they can consistently do without to much effort and so on, and something which is not.
I believe Captain America once knocked out Thor. Does that mean he can consistently knock out people on Thors level? Not a chance, it was there to serve the plot and has no consistency with the character at all.
Its the same as Sonic and his time travel feat. Just because it was shown, does not make it consistent with the character.
Another example of this is when Goku is hurt by a rock tossed at him by Kirllin, that would directly conflict with the fact that he has tanked planet busters and so on.
You applied this rule to a one off event in our daily lives, and what you go on to say is that by our logic none of these events occured. That is not what we are saying, we are saying that the likelyhood of these events occuring again in the same fashion are virtually impossible.
how is sonic proved to be called the fastest thing alive? look at the video.
Again this rule does not stretch to other forms of fiction, people like Flash and Zoom and many thousands to millions of times faster than Game Sonic.
at 4:14 that bird (jet) calls him by that name. thus the sonic wikia was telling the absolute truth.
the sonic wikia also said that sonic can run backwards. this came from the sonic wikia, so its wrong and biased. WRONG! not only did they give you proof by saying the game of when it appeared, but i also have a video to back up their proof.
Now I can't speak for everyone else here, but I for one feel that wikia pages have come along way since 5-6 years ago. Back then you could not trust a word on them, but now they are mostly reliable sources of information for people who do not follow that form of fiction. BUT they are still fan made which means they are prone to error, and when one is writing a wikipedia entry for the likes of sonic he does not take into account the likes of Flash and Zoom when saying "Sonic is the fastest thing alive".
you didnt answer 100Rings question of goku ever beating the villains/demons/aliens of the sonic universe. instead you lead it off with a nice big RED HERRING! to get what you ever so "want", they have shown planet busting. why in the heck would sonic defeat Dark Gaia if it wasnt a threat to planet busting? and in sonic adventure 2, the bio lizard was about to destoy the earth. its time for YOU to think now. Black Doom (shadow the hedgehog just ask for proof) wanted to take down his master and use shadow to take over the universe. shadow had also said that he could destoy the earth, too. now, i know you are thinking "this is SHADOW!" but in sonic battle (AFTER the fact) sonic could beat him, so he can beat a plante buster. now that your Red Herring is booted out the window, ANSWER 100RINGS'S QUESTION HE ASKED IN THE FIRST PLACE. and i have a few questions for YOU, also. has goku ever gotten out of time freeze, dealt with reality warping with ease, and transporting (NOT transmissing) with ease? all of these answers to these questions are an absolute NO. YOU stop acting like a fanboy. after all, you's better wtch it. last time i check, all you and DBZ_universe did and still do it rage about how he is "wrong" and "fanboyish", and you didnt give anything to support your point! not even a single quote of the wikia or video! all both of you did was rage! not one shred of proof! some nerve YOU both have! basicly, all you are worth here at the moment is just blowing a not of hot steam. i dont see why we have to break our back giving proof when you dont even give 1%. this isnt even an agument! this is just one sided in your view.
I am not going to debate Sonic here anyway since I never found any appeal from those games aside from old school 2D sonic. I could never understand why people enjoyed them so much, I guess I just never liked all the flashing lights and/or colourful scenery. What I will say is this going from my knowledge of Sonic, Goku is more powerful than Sonic, the speed they both have should be in the same region but Sonic just lacks any real strength or attacking power to hurt Goku. That is why he loses.